Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Ruby Creek Resources Inc RBYC

Ruby Creek Resources Inc. is engaged in developing a gold property. The Company's project includes the Gold Plateau Project. The Gold Plateau Project consists of property, which has artisanal gold mining activities. The Gold Plateau Project is located in southern Tanzania approximately 150 kilometers north of the Mozambique border. The Gold Plateau Project consists of around 15 properties of prospective gold mineralized territory. The Company has mining and processing equipment onsite and additional processing equipment. The Gold Plateau Project is situated at the eastern margin of the Selous Basin where the Karoo and young sedimentary rock are in fault contact with low to high-grade metamorphosed rocks of Neoproterozoic age belonging to the Mozambique Belt.


GREY:RBYC - Post by User

Comment by cadillacsamon Jul 23, 2012 10:33pm
99 Views
Post# 20144870

RE: Press Release out

RE: Press Release out

Laughable if it wasn't so absurd. You should stick to being an attorney because you can't do basic math.

NEW YORK, July 23, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- Ruby Creek Resources, Inc. (RBYC), a gold exploration and mining company with operations in Tanzania, hereby provides an operations update. Ruby Creek test mining on its GS1 mining license area during the quarter ended May 31, 2012 yielded recovered grades which we estimate varied from 0.16 to 0.86 g/lcm (loose cubic meter) and approximately 14 ounces of gold.

There is nothing that says that says how much of each grade they processed. It is unbelievable that they could not keep track of that. If the grade had been actually at .51 then the total processed would certainly have been more than 14 ounces in 3 months. Do they really think people are that stupid to swallow this lack of professionalism and clarity? There is no such thing as an average grade when they don't report the total tonnage processed.

total tons divided by grams recovered = grade

So how much tonnage did they put in to get 14 ounces in 3 months? well, if the grade was .5 grams per ton, they would have only had to mine 800 tons. At 40 tons per hour that would be a total of 20 hours in three months of work. Not possible to have .5 grams per ton is it? If they were only processing 20 tons per hour then it would have only taken 40 hours to get the 14 ounces. What did they do for the other 11 weeks out of 12 weeks? No the grade probably is very low; maybe .1 grams per ton, that is why they are not reporting total tonnage. Also recovery percentages may have been very low even if a higher grade of gold was there.

Stinks to high heaven.

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>