Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Nevada Geothermal Power Inc V.NGP



TSXV:NGP - Post by User

Comment by R_J_on Nov 08, 2012 10:40pm
237 Views
Post# 20579818

RE: News - Director, Dr. Bloomquist, Resigns

RE: News - Director, Dr. Bloomquist, Resigns

News Release - November 6

About Nevada Geothermal Power Inc.:

Nevada Geothermal Power Inc. is an experienced renewable energy producer focusing on the development of CLEAN electrical power from high temperature geothermal resources in the United States. NGP currently owns a 100% leasehold interest in several properties in Nevada and California, and a 50% interest in Crump Geyser, in Oregon. These properties are at different levels of exploration and development.

-

News Release - July 20, 2012

About Nevada Geothermal Power Inc.:

Nevada Geothermal Power Inc. operates the 49.5 MW Faulkner 1 geothermal plant in Nevada. It is a renewable energy developer focused on producing clean, efficient and sustainable geothermal electric power from high temperature geothermal resources in the United States. NGP currently owns leasehold interests in six properties: Blue Mountain, Pumpernickel Valley, Edna Mountain and North Valley in Nevada, New Truckhaven in California, and Crump Geyser, in Oregon. These properties are at different levels of exploration and development.

 

####################################

What has changed?

It looks like our [old] Flagship, the 49.5 Faulkner I plant, is no longer mentioned.

Am I to assume that it is ‘Lost and gone forever’?

-

Is our 50% interest in Grump Geyser, the new Flagship?

Is Crump Geyser to be our major topic from this point?

-

RJ

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>