Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Claude Res Inc CLGRF

"Claude Resources Inc is engaged in the acquisition, exploration, and development of gold and other precious metal properties. Its projects include Seabee Property and various exploration properties located at Laonil Lake. It also owns Amisk Gold Property."


GREY:CLGRF - Post by User

Comment by December3on Mar 09, 2013 12:08pm
163 Views
Post# 21104704

RE: RE: 5 YEARS to fail again

RE: RE: 5 YEARS to fail again

cre8 dude, please keep posting as the more your do the more it is clear that you know little about mining and have bought CRJ and now "hope" to help yourself and your investment by continually spamming this board with your show of ignorance.

.

Is it possible that CRJ does not have the man-power, equipment, etc. to mine enough faces underground to produce >1000 tpd?  Or is the fact that CRJ has excess capacity sitting around unused, while it struggles to generate cash, an indication of bad management?  Which one?

.

Then while one is looking at drilled grades and translating those directly to head grades...I guess one's extensive underground mining experience tells you there is no need to consider dilution - especially with narrow vein mining.

.

But hey, keep counting on Gap ounces that have not been drilled off yet. I guess you would like to be like  MTO when it was mining the Barry Pit "blind?"  That is always a great idea and path for long-term viability.

.

But what you gents need to recognize is that costs are high and the industry is changing.  Look Barrick and the other large companies are now reporting "all-in" costs per ounce.  Barrick reported that full year 2013 All-In costs are projected to be $1,000 to $1,100.  What do you suppose CRJ's costs are going to be?   When do you suppose CRJ management will adopt the new industry standard or continue with the highly misleading "cash cost" metric?

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>