Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Claude Res Inc CLGRF

"Claude Resources Inc is engaged in the acquisition, exploration, and development of gold and other precious metal properties. Its projects include Seabee Property and various exploration properties located at Laonil Lake. It also owns Amisk Gold Property."


GREY:CLGRF - Post by User

Comment by December3on Mar 10, 2013 10:01pm
151 Views
Post# 21108940

RE: RE: Cash Flows - FUTURE DUH!

RE: RE: Cash Flows - FUTURE DUH!

Oh Bottles - you present yourself as Gent and above the fray then you come up with a blatantly sexist comment like that?  You sir are sexist PIG!

.

You can't predict the price of gold over the next 5-years? Huh, what do you suppose Analysts do?  Throw their hand up and say it can't be done?

.

Shoot - read these BBs and one will see all kinds of support for articles that claim gold is going to 3500 (Sinclair) or 5000 (McEwen). You would up grade a post stating one of those figures but won't venture an educated guess on future prices?

.

What? you can't look back at the past and see that over the last 6 years that POG has gone up an average of 19.4% per year.  Just because one can't predict the exact number doesn't mean the exercise is useless.  What if one were to put a growth rate of 20% per year into their prediction/model and that turns out to be high - then what? Obviously one's cash flows and thus share price is going to be too high.  So you play around with the parameters and see how it effect the outcome - that analysis tells you key things about how the company should be valued. 

.

But alas, apparently you'd rather be a sexist PIG than have a decent conversation here. Sad.

.

Good luck with your back of the envelope calculations and "hope"!

.

PIG!

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>