Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Compliance Energy Corp CPYCF

Compliance Energy Corp Is a Canada-based exploration and development company. The company is engaged in the exploration and development of resource properties. The firm is an exploration and development company working on resource properties it has staked or acquired, principally on Vancouver Island. It has interest in Comox Joint Venture (CJV), which holds the Raven Underground Coal Mining Project (Raven Project).


GREY:CPYCF - Post by User

Comment by 2guyson Apr 01, 2013 4:27pm
146 Views
Post# 21193994

RE: RE: Re Walter Energy Shuts mine and charged w/

RE: RE: Re Walter Energy Shuts mine and charged w/

minor007, I agree with your post.

 

As for economics, I'm not sure how much the economics at Raven have changed, but if costs remain little changed, then whether it be Met or Thermal coal, the cost FOB port Alberni will be well below the current selling price of either commodity IMO. 

 

mokita likes to rant about things that aren't directly related, but I would hope that the EAO will look at Raven in particular and its strategy when it comes to complying within the EIS/AIR Requirements.  That's what I would expect anyway.  It would seem the reasonable way to handle this.  JMO

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>