Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

VIRGINIA HILLS OIL CORP VFGGF

"Virginia Hills Oil Corp, formerly Pinecrest Energy Inc was incorporated under the ABCA on March 24, 2006 under the name Testudo Oil & Gas Exploration Ltd. The Company is a Calgary, Alberta-based oil and natural gas exploration, production and development company with operations in the Canadian provinces of Alberta and Saskatchewan."


GREY:VFGGF - Post by User

Comment by terroiron May 02, 2013 1:39pm
130 Views
Post# 21330302

RE: RE: RE: Dundee again...2nd largest hold of sha

RE: RE: RE: Dundee again...2nd largest hold of sha

RPL is a totally different fish. They have embarked on a strategic review (code for we are in deep dodoo) and changed board members in favour of those able to handle highly debt leveraged work outs. Their debt to cash flow is an order of magnitude higher, and they have to deal with the dividend payments further dragging cash. They are probably dealing with wells not performing to expectation because something has drastically affected their business model expectations in a very short period of time, and it isn't macro such as commodity pricing.

Pinecrest does not have the same cash flow issues, but needs the water-flood to demonstrate that they can properly manage production declines and maximize recovery. They expect to end the year with 1x debt to forward cash flow, very manageable.

Only if the waterflood is a complete bust does this company have issues. For that to happen, they would have to either see no response or an extremely high water cut, where the injected water flows straight through to the producers. Early response to their pilot and the first 100% company owned project showed no such issues. 

Much to learn with the quarterly report after market on May 13.

 

Terr

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>