RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: fl I think many have chimed in with their comments that support my overall perspective that the write up was over promotional and lacking any of the real past dirt. If you want to claim that a scant reference to 'a few past hiccups' was adequate disclosure of SND past failures then I guess we really don't have much to discuss. I don't read your blog so the info there is not relevant to the discussion of the newsletter as far as i am concerned.
At the end of the day, your article is not targeted at any of us here since the people here are already interested in SND so there was nothing new for us.
I do appreciate your acknowledgment that you came on too strong and frankly when I dismissed the write up I had no idea discussion would continue (especially with said author) It was not my intention to start a flame war. I do hope your newsletter does well and wish you the best.
Anyway, so far today the new SND seems to be holding on and we are down 1/2 cent in pre-consolidation terms.
In my opinion, Nolan has to have some catalyst hiding up his sleeve. he can't expect to keep over $3 for long without one.