RE:RE:RE:Lets think about itHello aknahow,
Your post says: "Did they say it indirectly with a locations map that did not show proposed holes over what the reader could or shgould have know were not prime locations?"
The last info on drilling the first hole in Guama anomaly was in the 16 May 2013 which said: "The first hole is underway at the Guama anomaly, 2km west of Las Tres Palmas, where surface sampling include results up to 34% copper, overlying a strong chargeability anomaly".
But I don't recall seeing any location map for the 5 holes at that time.
If there were such a map (showing the location for the first 5 holes which can be seen to be outside the "sweet spots") then the company could not be criticized for non-disclosure. Sometimes, for various reasons, companies can be quite cryptic.
Let hope that GQC will have permission to drill at Guama sweet spots soon, then it would be to the company's advantage to disclose, prior to drilling, the precise locations of the new holes on a good map. It's just a good parctice for investors relations.
Cheers,
goldhunter