RE:Slander and more slanderSaabmaster wrote:
Firstly Wooly and Foggy....
It would appear that you are correct.... Thank yo!!!!! Apparently Executive12 was never involved in anything.....I understand that he/she has taken Legal advice on these remarks and is in the position of doing something about it....BTW...I am not the aforenamed person.
This is my only name and from what I understand, I have also been attached to several complaints on here and otherwise.
I don't like some of the comments on here about 'Bert'...Uncalled for.
I do feel that the Mgmt of this Company is involved in something other than a normal course of business. I would strongly suggest that everyone put Schmidt or whatever and Greenfield on ignore.
They are setting people (knowingly )up for a fall, and to gain an illegal advantage. Q's are asked by Greenfield just as a set up.
There will be a conclusion to this matter, not immediately through the Civil Courts, but by those whom are better suited to this work.
To Greenfield/Duncan etal . You have been discovered....there will be consequences. To swear before a Court something that has been manufactured to suit the circumstances is unlawful.....be suitably advised...
And Thank You to those honest people......
seems like Im always trying to read between the lines cus no one is clear. that i assume is to always have 'an out'
all I want to know is if CCB is headed for the real deal ?
or
Is it just a name change and a p-n-d ?
they seem to be reporting fundamental corporate information ??? but I dont have the mining background to say weather its real or not