Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Duluth Metals Ltd DULMF



GREY:DULMF - Post by User

Comment by goldsternpon Jul 06, 2014 5:35pm
255 Views
Post# 22719645

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:What Anto had to say

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:What Anto had to sayMost of you seem to know more about mining issues than I do so I would like to hear what you think.

The agreement says
"Antofagasta will provide US $130 million in direct funding to the project for its 40% interest in the joint ventur - Thereafter, if Antofagasta elects to proceed with the further funding of the project and to maintain its 25% Option, Antofagasta will disproportionately fund 65% of the joint venture expenditures and Duluth will fund 35%;

Seems to me that Anto is unwilling to unwilling to provide further funding and therefore are releasing their 25% option as agreed ?

The upcoming report is a PFS and not a BFS so it seems that the 25% Option issue is not relevant to the upcoming report but it would be if there is another round of financing needed.

Looks like we might be in casino mode for a while ?

Good luck
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>