RE:Just for you John328"if they post under only one or one of a dozen. What does it matter."
It matters to Stockhouse and to the people who use this message boaed for it's intended purpose.
STOCKHOUSE NETWORK OF SITES PROHIBITED USER CONTENT AND CONDUCT
You will not and will not permit any third party to:
register for more than one user account, register for a user account on behalf of an individual other than yourself, register for a user account on behalf of any group or entity, use or attempt to use another's account, service or system without prior written authorization from Stockhouse and/or create a false identity on or through any of the Stockhouse Network of Sites, including without limitation any Site Content, Applications and/or Services;
:"Any board I do post on under what name any give day is immaterial to what is being said."
It is very material as it goes to credibility, to which you have none.
"i always feel sorry for you longs who probably bought into. This company for dollars instead of penny's and now feel you have an axe to grind."
Really?...You see (unlike you) a person can go into my posting history and see that you are lying. My position and positions are and have been clear at all times and it is nothing like what you have said.
"Because even in your pea Bain you must realize this stock is probably not going north of .50 cents for a long time to come."
It is not highly likely under the present circumstances and I know that
my posting history does reflect that sentiment.
"Please josn don't feel it your responsibility to bash everybody who comes on this board."
Again, my posting history shows that to be another lie on you part. I can not remember the last time I have taken such a dislike to a Stockhouse multi handle poster as I have to you. Just a second, I remember now...I never have in my 10 years posting as John 378. Maybe it is the compulsive lying, maybe it is the disrespect for those that actually use this board as civilized adults to discuss this company and share information, maybe it is the flagrant abuse of Stockhouses's TOS...maybe it is all of it....Yes I am sure of it now. It is a cumulative disgust.
"You were stupid enough to buy in for dollars . Maybe some of us bought in for pennies and can see a half decent profit. Being made at .30 cents."
I did that?...really?...So once again you are showing why you have to cover your tracks from board to board. If you did not then when you flutter onto a new board calling for 3-5-10 baggers without knowing the first thing about the company, all a person has to do is click on your history and they would know instantly that you are nothing more than lying punk....but when you hide your history most of us assume that is the reason why and after a half dozen of your posts, we are sure of it.
Tell you what punk, I am going to back my words. Here is the value of credibility. The following is a post that I wrote to this board
5 years ago. Not only can a person see that I was speaking openly and honestly with them (respect) when I gave my opinion, they can also read this post and think it was written today. We will never see anything like this from you because......well.... we all know why
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: News from IDC and Global V
"sure, makes sense - and grocery stores have to spend millions in R&D to invent new and innovative lines of shelving!! lure top cashiers with stock options etc. Lol!
"
LOL..Ok, I guess the light point I was trying to make was lost. My only real point is that in my 2+ years of tracking this stock I have never seen the effort to take it to the next step.
There are a lot of little private businesses out there that are quite happy to just pay their bills and employees and only spend the money required to maintain the business. That attitude will allow for pricing that will keep the customers coming in, which is great if you are a private little company and that is all you want.
IDC management seems to have that attitude too, which is not great when you are a publicly owned company. Status quo mentality in that business arena, means price stagnation for the shares.
I may be wrong with my interpretation of what I am seeing from management, but as long as they seem to be content with +1-0-(-1) quarters, I will continue to only track them from the sidelines and place money in more aggressive growing companies. Oh yes Shackle, as long as they continue to report +1-0-(-1) quarters, it would take a divine gift from the PE Gods in order for this to see $1.
Good luck to you people holding,and here is to hoping "Rumple" wakes from his sleep...But I now honestly believe it will take new management in order for that to happen.