RE:RE:Financing in the works?For a non-board member to report "distracting" that the 2nd largest shareholder should be ignored? Only after a public announcement concern shareholders, they say ANYTHING?
Such a "pain" to listen to shreholders who OWN the company.
I agree they got to go.
RoadHouse wrote: Jimmy2014 wrote: .... This means that, in addition to forcing the corporation to incur material costs associated with a distracting and unnecessary proxy contest, the dissident intends to recover his costs from the corporation. Based on other proxy contests, these costs could be in the hundreds of thousands of dollars. The corporation believes this would be a poor use of the corporation's cash.
The board has failed to make any meaningful progress with my investment and needs to go! This proposed financing is too little, too late.