RE:RE:RE:Questions for strategic alternatives committee...
I know MC, I read that too, but not much that has been said so far fits properly. Doug leaving was presented as being part of the plan but given it would have taken month(s) for the process of hiring a CEO then one would left believing that this was already a done deal months ago.
If you do believe that then where is this vote? If you do not believe that, and Doug just informed them days before he announced taking the position, and they chose to package as it was planned, then that leaves the press release saying things that are not exactly a proper representation of what is going on. To top that off they said they were in preliminary discussions in the first PR but then in the second one they drop it all together and did not say if they were advancing, ongoing or just plain dropped. Giving all that I would not bet the farm on their spoken and unspoken words. Something is coming down the pipes and you only know that for sure because their finances are forcing the issue.