Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

CANEXUS CORP 6.5 PCT DEBS T.CUS.DB.D



TSX:CUS.DB.D - Post by User

Comment by Khersonon Sep 02, 2015 8:01pm
216 Views
Post# 24073687

RE:RE:Done Deal

RE:RE:Done Deal
Calgaryrider wrote: <div> &quot;Nearly 84,000 barrels a day moved south of the border on trains in the second quarter. That&rsquo;s about 30 per cent less than the nearly 120,000 barrels a day that were exported by rail in the first quarter.</div> <div> &nbsp;</div> <div> It&rsquo;s an even sharper drop from the roughly 159,000 barrels a day in the last three months of 2014.&quot;<br /> <br />

With adjustments, meaning downside, I bet, thatS $500m capital gone for probably $60m......wow.     They couldn't have timed it any worse.



Calgaryrider, you have posted some very good points.
I find it odd that Canexus did not report the net proceeds of the NATO transaction! I am wondering if the MEG lawsuit/settlement may have adversely affected the final realized price of NATO? If a Canexus/MEG settlement was reached whereas Canexus was required to pay MEG, it would not surprise me a bit that those monies came from the proceeds of the NATO sale!
Kherson

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>