RE:RE:Seeking Alpha Ucore ArticleI read the article thro twice and in a nutshell the author just does not seem to like the rhetoric coming out of Ucore. He admits to no insider knowledge. All that he is saying is that the claims ( except #3) that Ucore makes cannot be substantiated or for that matter unsubstantiated. Point taken. We would all like more information but do you really think that as IBC and Ucore develop this pilot plant, they are going to provide a vivid, blow by blow description of the plant's evolution? As to point #3, maybe McKenzie did err in his comments but maybe the author is also a bit overly sensitive, given Seeking Alpha's endorsement of Texas Rare Earth's competitive separation technology process. (Maybe he should now write an article describing the weaknesses and hurdles involved in this technology). The point is that none of this rhetoric proves or disproves anything and ultimately all investors are at the mercy of technology, markets and luck. Nothing he says will cause me to rethink my "risky" investment in Ucore.