RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Any TA's wanna predict next week?Agreed, but you do know that 90% of the "guys" on SH are traders right? Very few real investors and those that are here get really, really confused with the 2bit trading clown side shows.
Also, don't be so quick on blaming Wall Street. We have big Canadian based short attacks from Bay Street as well.
I was surprised when we started to tag some of these guys to find out that most of them are in fact in Canada! Not sure about CXR, haven't been following much. This was on a big short attack/take over take-own in the oil patch.
Pack of wolves these guys.
adamchess wrote: Whether a company pays dividends is often a determining factor on whether a fund will even consider investing in a particular stock. We are not all short-term traders who invest in CXRX/CXR. Obvously, it makes little difference to VRX (or does it?) US/International hedge funds probably the biggest influence shorting and cross-trading and manipulating the stock price lower withouting penalty from IIROC or SEC. Continued strong performance by company will eventually put these clowns to rest and move on.
FullReversal wrote: OMG! Don't follow anyone! Sorry to say but you are "fresh meat" for the street sharks.
Pull up the investor web site and Concordia or reputable sites and do your own research!!!
And yes "They" are the short sellers and market manipulators.
Funny angle on the dividends. I can tell you that 95% of the guys here don't care a bit about dividends! If you can about dividends, buy banks.
With the current state of the markets with crazy volatility and uncontrolled short attacks, I would never advise anyone to invest based on dividends. If I find a stock with dividend, it's just extra spare change.
looking4hits wrote: I followed someone else here. I'm new, sorry for the novice questions after a quick review of what CXR is.
Is the uncertainty around this stock because of the debt from the last acquisition?
Do they have any issues repaying the debt?
Who is "THEY" are pushing down the stock on low volume. The short sellers?
Don't they have to rebuy? Are they the only ones with reason to be highly negative for no reasons?
I can see being negative from the debt but if you look at cash flow, aren't they ok?
This is not a small company at $1.7B, that's substantially less than the last acquisition.
I do question the rational of paying a 1.2% dividend? That seems silly but on the plus side, if they start increasing it to 3% after the last acquisition has been digested, everyone will be saying "dividends at Concordia increases over 100%"? Makes for good press?