RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:The bottom priceIf they were interested in Valeant why not Concordia? Better company, outlook and clean accounting books.. why not? Yours truly Andrew McCreath seems to believe as well. And I never believe in WSJ but I liked Amber's piece recently. Not making buy or sell decisions on any report but only on Co releases.. CB
terminator007 wrote: CB: you seem to be obsessed with Takeda. what's wrong with you? Where did you get that Takeda is interested at all?
Will ppl believe you or BNN/WSJ? Please stop this non-sense.
curiousbuild wrote: I will happily take 3.5 shares of Takeda. I don't think it's APO in talks at all.. Guessing games just getting exhausting.
donaldspice wrote: A company that just bought 4 new products doesn't seem to be anywhere close to having to divest anything. This is short rhetoric that has been imagined. The company would not continue to but products if they felt they were anywhere close to meeting their debt obligations