RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:growth reiteratedWe don't have to go into past postings; let's take your last one. You state the reality is in the numbers. Who would not agree with that? Unfortunately using numbers is not exactly your strength and I never see much of them in your postings but definitely not in this one. Among other emotional statements with no merits is the one "there is no conspiracy". No merits because you demonstrate no numbers nor reasons and you refuse to accept facts which by us have been uncovered and have been there for everybody to see. First Clarence or myself do not use sensational expressions of this kind so I have to assume that you mean what we called manipulation. Well we both explained in different ways, hoping that it would help those less inclined to think, of certain anomalies in trading which we interpreteted very carefully as rampant manipulation. We both told the readers where and how to find it and how we had to come to this conclusion. Furthermore, we asked all of you to let us know if somebody could find a different conclusion as ours because both of us have enough experience to know that sometimes other people could contribute facts or opinions that could lead to having second thoughts. We never have been given a reason to to retest our findings, in fact we never heard of anybody. After a while we stopped using numbers and reasons knowing that it would not help and even upset those who obviously are satified with empty claims to be masters of finding the truth without even knowing or considering the facts that possibly could lead to finding it.
It goes without saying that I do not expect you to understand that but fortunately there are others who will do so. A lot of people have made valuable contributions and this is why maybe I will continue to participate