RE:RE:RE:RE:So Canadians will not be able to join the lawsuit?Lattice , that goes for the US law firms, since the assets are held in the carabbean.
quote=LaticelnExile]The problem for Canadian law firms is that that the assets are not held in Canada, (the liabilities are here tho'!) .. .[Source: 2015 Financial Statements, filed on SEDAR] so intuitively I think it would be challenging for a Canadian firm to collect if and when in Ch 11.
TOMMY1 wrote: Lots of selection! Thanks for sharing, will call some of those up. Ideally, we want a Canadian law firm representing us though but I will take whatever representation I can get.
LaticelnExile wrote: MustardTiger88 wrote: I've looked around and nowhere can I find a difinitive answer. Are there any firms that are representing Canadians? The only one that even mentions CXR (as opposed to CXRX only) is KTMC, but they responded that they will only be representing those that bought on the Nasdaq. The clock is ticking and I don't want to miss out on being a part of it.
Have you checked all of these out? (Not a recommendation, just passing these names of some firms who have actions against Concordia that are on my Bloomberg.) This list is likely not complete, but these firms had indicated their intentions to pursue litigation and may be able to represent you
Glancy Prongy & Murray LLP
Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman $ Hertz
Pomerantz
Safirstein Metcalf
Rosen Law
Holzer & Holzer LLC
Vicent Wong
Bower Pivan
Bronstein, Gerwitz & Grossman LLC
Levi & Korsinsky LLP
Lundin Law
Lifshitz & Miller
Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check LLP
Goldberg
Rigrosky & Long
Howard G. Smith
Robbins Arroyo LLP
[/quote]