It's gold in the ground & shares owned thats important sincelike gold is real money when all currencies in the world are being
printing up to death, diluting their worth,
also shares of gold stocks
are money too. And when I say gold and gold stocks I'm also
referring to precious metals and their stocks.
What's important is not consolidations, because management
thinks there are too many outstanding shares. And not consolidations
through mergers because management thinks bigger will get better
price rallies when the gold bubble takes off. And not buyouts which
are essentially mergers and consolidations of shares again, also just
as erroneous as better price getters in a future gold bubble.
Bigger takes off sooner but ultimately does no better exponentially
or proportionally than smaller producing gold companies. As I have
shown many times by this article about the late 1970s to 1980 gold
bubble. Showing how sub dollar producing gold stocks did in the
1980 gold bubble when bought them a few years earlier and BOD
were not foolishly pushing consolidations, merger consolidations or
buyout consolidations, then.
https://commonstockwarrants.com/gold-and-silver-stocks-how-high-can-they-go/ All these things are being pushed again, and by all gold stocks'
BOD (board of directions), the rich gold bug owners of all gold
stocks and really proxies for central banks, however much they
say they hate central banks and they should all be abolish.
The BOD of directors have many posters pushing more mergers
or buyouts, flooding gold boards, with their ridiculous post messages
that are ultimately harmful to investors, long and short, who are
taught increasingly just to treat gold stocks and shares as flipping
products, speculations, and not long term holds, or not as money.
Not only is gold money, but shares of gold stocks are money too
and not to be treated as consolidation productions or flipping products,
short term holds, and speculation products instead of long term holds
and money.
Gold shares will be key to surviving the eventual financial and economic
collapse, when the false non kennedys keynesian type of nixon and
really the far right too (since was made to fail and then print to death
made worse on top of that) falls apart and treated as not something
to reform or that there is a superior sound and moral Keynesian type in
the background (the kennedys'), but both thrown out with the bath water
as it were.
All shown by the Triffin Paradox, written in 1960, which the kennedys
were reforming by not trading to death with the 3rd world emerging markets,
who the west can't compete with. But to have marshall like infrastructure
building up programs, for the 3rd world. This link only shows the problem
but not the kennedys solution of not trading to death with the 3rd world,
but infrastructure building up programs, to address the too lopsided
development division between 1
st and 3
rd world, and the inevitably crushing
Triffin Paradox.
‘Trump's Ignorance (the Triffin paradox)’
Hugo Salinas Price
https://www.plata.com.mx/mplata/articulos/articlesFilt.asp?offset=140&fiidarticulo=303 “In 1960, the economist Robert Triffin detected the central problem
residing in the Bretton Woods Agreements. I detected the same problem
without having any knowledge of "Triffin's Paradox", as it has come to
be known. Many years ago, sitting in my office smoking my cigar and
contemplating the world's financial situation, I came to the same
conclusion as Triffin. (Unfortunately he doesn’t mention the Kennedys’
proper Keynesianism solution for it. Not trading with the 3
rd world trading
imbalance snare, but infrastructurally building them up. Basically Barbara
Ward’s, Space ship earth, program for the 3
rd world. Here criticized as
mythology or impossible, and in Nixon’s failed Keynesianism type
perspective, thinking it is the kennedys’ Keynesianism type too.
https://fee.org/articles/the-mythology-of-spaceship-earth/ )”
However, if the kennedys had been successful, and not assassinated,
(Ted both in an airplane crash attempt in 1964 leaving him hospitalized,
not able (as a senator then) to run in his slain brother JFK's place, and
then character assassinated in 1967's chappiquidick incidence, so couldn't
run in his slain brother RFK's place), that means the democrats, (the real
democrats and not the branch party one of both the northeastern republicans
and far right republicans, that is made to fail and print to death), would have
been in charge. Not the banksters and central banks, who loan both to the
1st world and 3rd world, interlocking their lopsided development level
problems together, to control them to recklessness and death. Including to
financially and economically, crash them to death. Where we are about
at now.
That was Thomas Jefferson's far seeing problem warning too, he saw for the
republic:
‘Perception Management and the Economic Spider's Web’
Simon Davies & Donald Hunt
https://www.sott.net/article/167857-Perception-Management-and-the-Economic-Spider-s-Web "I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties
than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to
control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the
banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive
the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the
continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from
the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs." Thomas
Jefferson 3rd president of the US (1743-1826), Letter to the Secretary of
the Treasury Albert Gallatin (1802)
Thomas Jefferson was right; he was right when in 1863/64 US agricultural
loans were called in at the behest of the Rothschild bankers in London, he
was right in the panic of 1906, he was right in the agricultural crisis of
1920/21, he was right in the Crash of 1929 and the Great Depression of the
early 1930's and he's right today. However, not even he could foresee that it
is not just the people of the US that are slaves to private banking interests
but all the peoples of the world.”