RE:@dart321. DON'T FEED INTO HIS BSThis below is only a fraction of the cr@p I've seen Dart spew. From what I've seen, he says one thing, but does the opposite. Lesson here, don't trust anyone on the message boards and do your own DD. The market speaks the brutal truth...so when a stock has been in a steady downtrend for over a month...and then goes down more, it ain't a "shake out"..its the stock losing its momentum, and there is simply more selling pressure/volume than buying. No two ways around it. Dont let the stooges sugar coat it.
Promoney77 wrote: so today you say it shouldn't have been at $1.95. Let's take a little timeline of your posts here....FEB 15 (@ $1.09) - "little birdy saying shorts are about to get fried..... FEB 10 (@1.14) - "a very good chance there will be no more looking back. I also think there could be a very good possibility we may see new highs" (what happened to $1.95 was too high and we should be in the middle)....... FEB 6 (@1.06) - "the stock spikes to $1.25/$1.35 and climbs from there quick. In my opinion that is what is likely going to happen." .....JAN 30 (@1.16) - "next 3 weeks will be massive" .... JAN 28 (@1.18) "soon we will most certainly see news highs and depending on how big it or they are we might see a market cap above 100 million" (ps. that would the price at approx $4).......okay we can skip a little to the highs..... DEC 7 (@ $1.80, high $1.95) "got a nice chunk of shorted paper...waiting for them to try it again" (wait.. didn't you say $1.95 was too high, why would you be buying at these levels?)... again DEC 7 "shorts are going to get creamed" ......... so on and so forth. look this guys history, it is so blatantly obvious he is a paid promoter it is pathetic. I could list countless other posts. Hopefully people look themselves and see through your BS.