RE:RE:RE:This is why SCY can't/shouldn't be open on the ML processI agree 100%.
Thanks to JK constant pumping of this stock I did very well with SCY so far. However, now it is time for some reality checks. Huge dreams but the facts are less promising ones. We are almost 5 months after the lease half-promise by the CEO. (Mid December, remember?)
In an interview, Mr. Putnam gave in 2016, he said that the mine will be up and running in Q1 2017. If I have the right calendar, this will never happen. The fact is that they are too optimistic. Who knows what else they are too optimistic about? I respect JK a lot, he helped me to do well on some of his recommendations, but I lost big chunks of money too because of some of his recommendations. What happens if tomorrow the company tell us that the new minister would like to revise some of the permits? When the company is silent this could be no big deal, but it could be an alarming sign to investors. What does it take to inform investors about some changes in the schedule? There is nothing confidential about it while it will remove some nervousness from investors like you and me. How come that the information I have is from a third party (JK) and not the company itself?