RE:RE:RE:RE:Another Article That I hope no one has posted yetTx - comments of QH and ES (and even DL) in very different contexts
Agreed, though I view the level of positivity has risen in the last two weeks, The commentary seen from the three of them this week has been remarkable. Public commentary is usually a very solid Canadian style, the nature of which is to down play. IMO The "B" word my have found some regulatory roots and sent out a few flying monkeys in Oz.
Facts are facts, one of the chief concerns was satisfied with the gold in that pan. The game plan changed that day as a result this is now far bigger than the S&P/TSX Venture imagined. Then, it starts with a B comment. ARV starting up the mill sans PEA or FEA or Bankable EA or Jorq or 43-101. ARV is spending on capital equipment without a Study, Who does that! Only some one who is 100% sure.
The MMS assays are proof. CRA hole is proof. The trench photos are proof. The live video is proof. Fossikers are proof. Punters are proof. KL is proof. The Sheikh is proof, The first bulk sample is proof just as the 8 horizion layers are proof of the reefs eb and flow. I could go on and on and on. ES open your eyes. Its bigger than Voiseys Bay too.
Indeed Sunny Ways!