Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Equity Metals Corp V.EQTY

Alternate Symbol(s):  EQMEF

Equity Metals Corporation is engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral and diamond properties in British Columbia, Saskatchewan and the Northwest Territories. It owns a 100% interest, with no underlying royalty, in the Silver Queen project, located along the Skeena Arch in the Omineca Mining Division, British Columbia. The property hosts high-grade, precious- and base-metal veins related to a buried porphyry system, which has been only partially delineated. It has a controlling joint venture interest (57.49%) in the Monument Diamond project, NWT, strategically located in the Lac De Gras district within 40 kilometers (km)of both the Ekati and Diavik diamond mines. It also has royalty and working interests in other Canadian properties. Its WO Project is located in the Lac de Gras area, over 300 km north-northeast of the city of Yellowknife in the Northwest Territories, Canada. Its La Ronge Silica Project is an historic sand quarry located in central Saskatchewan.


TSXV:EQTY - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by AUborealison Nov 28, 2017 2:42pm
90 Views
Post# 27048000

Not sure about the timing of a 'cross', or if indeed there

Not sure about the timing of a 'cross', or if indeed therewas one.

And not sure of NNA's Insider Trading Policy, but this is what the TMXmoney site had to say...

    • Guidelines

      The Exchange suggests that a company's policy might:

      •  limit the number of people with access to confidential information
      •  require confidential documents to be locked up and code names to be used if necessary
      •  make sure that confidential documents cannot be accessed through technology such as shared servers
      •  educate all staff about the need to keep certain information confidential, not to discuss confidential information when they may be overheard, and not to discuss investment in the company, for example, in an investment club, when they are aware of confidential information (so that they don't influence the investments of other people, when they themselves are not allowed to trade).

       

  • Restrictions on Employee Trading

     

     

    • Sec. 423.8.

       

       

      The Disclosure Rules require that employees with access to material information be prohibited from trading until the information has been fully disclosed and a reasonable period of time has passed for the information to be disseminated. This period may vary, depending on how closely the company is followed by analysts and institutional investors.

      This prohibition applies not only to trading in company securities, but also to trading in other securities whose value might be affected by changes in the price of the company's securities. For example, trading in listed options or securities of other companies that can be exchanged for the company's securities is also prohibited.

      In addition, if employees become aware of undisclosed material information about another public company such as a subsidiary, they may not trade in the securities of that other company.

      In the case of pending transactions, the circumstances of each case should be considered in determining when to prohibit trading. In some cases, prohibition may be appropriate as soon as discussions about the transaction begin. The definition of materiality helps determine when trading should be prohibited in the case of pending transactions. Trading must be prohibited once the negotiations have progressed to a point where it reasonably could be expected that the market price of the company's securities would materially change if the status of the transaction were publicly disclosed. As the transaction becomes more concrete, it is more likely that the market will react. This prohibition on trading will often come into effect before the point in time when it must be disclosed publicly. In all situations, it is a judgment call as to when employee trading should be restricted.

      Guidelines

      The Exchange suggests that a company's policy address trading blackouts. Trading blackouts are periods of time during which designated employees cannot trade the company's securities or other securities whose price may be affected by a pending corporate announcement. A trading blackout:

      •  prohibits trading before a scheduled material announcement is made (such as the release of financial statements)
      •  may prohibit trading before an unscheduled material announcement is made, even if the employee affected doesn't know that the announcement will be made
      •  prohibits trading for a specific period of time after a material announcement has been made.

      It is easiest to implement a policy on trading blackouts that applies to scheduled announcements, such as the release of financial statements. In this case the policy might:

      •  prohibit trading by employees for a certain number of days before and after the release of financial statements
      •  provide "open windows", which are limited periods of time following the release of financial statements during which employees may trade.

      It is more problematic to implement a policy on trading blackouts for unscheduled announcements. A company should make the following decisions about its policy on trading blackouts according to its particular circumstances:

      •  should the policy apply to employees other than those already prevented from trading by insider trading rules (for example, senior employees not directly involved in the material transaction)?
      •  would telling an employee not to trade tip them off as to the content of the pending announcement?

      If a company decides to implement a preannouncement blackout policy, it might want to consider one of the following options:

      •  without giving a reason, instruct employees not to trade until further notice if there is a pending undisclosed material development
      •  require employees to obtain approval before trading, on the understanding that this approval will be denied if any material information has not been disclosed.

      A company policy on post-announcement trading blackouts should:

      •  state whether the blackout rules apply to all staff or only to those involved in the material transaction
      •  allow the market time to absorb the information before employees can resume trading. The amount of time that the market needs to absorb the information and set a new price level will depend upon the size of the company and to what extent it is tracked by analysts and investors.

      The Exchange also suggests that a company:

      •  circulate some basic do's and don'ts about employee trading to all their staff
      •  designate a contact person who is familiar with the disclosure rules and who can help employees determine whether or not they may trade in a given circumstance
      •  set expiry dates for the exercise of stock options and other such compensation plans so that the expiry dates normally would fall after the release of financial statements
      •  educate employees about any additional specific trading restrictions that may apply to them (for example, section 130 of the Canada Business Corporations Act generally prohibits insiders of CBCA companies from selling that company's shares short, or from buying or selling put or call options on the shares. Insiders of companies which have to report under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 may be subject to other restrictions, such as liability to account (for short swing profits.)
      •  decide whether employees who are subject to more stringent trading restrictions, and who are not required by law to file insider trading reports, should have to report details of their trading to the company
      •  decide whether the company should review insider trading reports to make sure that employees have complied with company policy and disclosure rules.
Bullboard Posts