Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Aptilon Corp APTOF



GREY:APTOF - Post by User

Post by smallcap87on Nov 30, 2017 10:56am
295 Views
Post# 27063491

Tough results

Tough resultsRevenue declined sequentially and costs (as well as capitalized costs) up substantially, sequentially q/o/q. The probability that Q4/17 will not be nearly as strong as Q4/16 has gone up. The apparent strong operating cash flow growth was entirely due do deferred revenue changes which will reverse during Q4.

Most troubling, however, is the lack of transparency around the company's new R&D activities, and the associated accounting treatment:

YTD capitalized R&D is $1.557m, compared to $0.020m for the same period last year. Of the YTD/17 amount, $742,000 was capitalized in the current quarter. This compares to just $20,000 expensed in the current quarter.

Those numbers alone do not suggest any improprieties, however, the company has not discussed in a transparent manner (respecting competitive constraints) the nature of the R&D spending, and its criteria for expensing vs. capitalization. The point is that management has significant discretion in what it chooses to expense vs. capitalize (more of the latter results in higher EBITDA), and of course interim statements are not reviewed by its auditors (who are themselves a small firm with incentive to please management during the year end audit: https://www.cagl.ca/en/about-us/profile/david-lavallee/default.idigit).

No accusations here - just raising the point. I invite management to increase transparency around the nature of its R&D spending, and the related accounting treatment.

I would also note, that capital expenditures have also increased a substantial amount, without commentary on the nature these expenditures ($723k YTD, vs. $nil last year).

The broader point about the business performance should be apparent: income statement and balance sheet spending is increasing materially, while revenues have been declining sequentially.

Hopefully this company doesn't turn out to be an example of where not to invest in small-cap land.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>