RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Lets be honest and objectiveEnough already you bunch of crybabies.
It's only two holes of a multi hole drill campaign, and one hole was nicely minearlized and we shall shortly recieve the results of the third.
Every hole adds information, even the so-called misses.
And we know that this property runs incredibly high silver valuse in the 'sweet spots' (see NR Dec 2015, Hole 12S-05)
And quit ragging on JoyfulGeo.
He said he liked the look of the pics BUT would NOT offer an opinion unless he could inspect them first hand...and that the XRF was a useful field tool BUT did not replace assaying...
All he said was he liked the core pics and was willing to hold onto his share position ...despite the stock price gyrations...until the assays...which aren't all released yet.
Too many 'wet behind the ears' on this Board, but alas, I guess they would have all been singing his praises and taking turns buying beers if the results were stronger.
And if you check the New Nadina News Releases you will see that Hole 12S-05 results were first released in April of 2013...but that a re-assay in December of 2015 revealed the DISCOVERY section.
So why wouldn't one try to double check these recent assays??? Seems labs do screw up from time to time, and who knows, maybe the lab techs wanted to get to their Christmas break...and rushed things through.
I'm not accusing them of that this time around...but, hey, why did they miss getting it right back in 2013?
if it was the same lab, then why not have a measure of doubt about this batch?
And why not get some other lab to do a few re-assays of certain sections??
Fool me once, shame on you...fool me twice...!!!