NAFTA tribunalI was just doing some background reading on the NAFTA suit. I'm sure most of you have seen the overview here:
https://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/topics-domaines/disp-diff/lone.aspx?lang=eng
Upon initial reading, it appears PPR doesn't have much of a case. Does anyone have any insight or reasoning to suggest that there's a reasonable chance of substantive damages being awarded?
One poster indicated that nearly half of cases in arbitration led to compensation for the claimant. But this doesn't shed any light on the specific merit of PPR's case. Another poster mentioned the compensation provided by Quebec to Corridor et al with respect to Anticosti. But this strikes me as an entirely different situation as Corridor was in a JV with an affiliate of the Quebec govt. (far from a NAFTA tribunal).
I understand that this is effectively a "free option". I'm just trying to better understand the mertis of the suit itself.