Reliq Health Technologies Inc V.RHT.H

RE:RE:MUST READ for all serious shareholders

[narmar]

Stellar detective work, there is no mention of 6 anything in her email.
But feel free to doubt ahead my friend.

narmar

Freelunch5 wrote: I am doubting the credibility of this alleged email from Lisa. If she had responded I am sure she would have corrected you and told you it was 6 doctors who signed up, not 6 clinics......

narmar wrote:

All serious shareholders need to read the following carefully. Do not jeopardize the very high level of customer satisfaction Reliq currently has. We are at the ground level of some potentially great things to come. 

 

I emailed Lisa to ask why the names of the six clinics they just signed weren’t disclosed and here is her response:

 

“The clinics we just signed didn’t want their names mentioned in the release because they had heard from Paz and RGVHA that they’ve been receiving a lot of calls from shareholders posing as reporters or potential patients, etc, and asking what they felt were intrusive questions about their businesses. It’s become a significant ongoing issue for those two clients. It’s the only complaint we’ve had from customers to date on any front. As a result the new clinics don’t want anyone knowing the name of their clinics or physicians. It’s actually creating a real problem for us as there are analysts who would like to initiate coverage but need to do a site visit in Texas first, but RGVHA and Paz are feeling like our shareholders are intruding on their privacy and disrupting their day to day workflow so they’re not feeling very open to any further intrusions. I’m hoping this won’t continue to be an issue with future clients since we do want to be able to reference the names of any new clients who are well known in the clinical community as that’s the most effective form of marketing there is!”

Good luck to all,
narmar

@kingnarmar