RE:RE:RE:RE:Hype and KneeJerk Reactions Daily Are Just Diddlingsolarman2013 wrote: 2) we already knew about this level of dilution months ago. The issue is HOW they communicated this time.
That is your trivial issue and since you aren't an analyst whose opinions are scrutinized you can say "Hey Look This Stock Is Falling because they didn't call it a Super Duper Dilution"
For any real investor how it was announced really doesn't matter all that much, the timing had to be mentioned. You seem to put so much emphasis on low volume trading days where the stock drops I don't. Already today the stock is up to $1.50 off its all time high.
solarman2013 wrote:
3) not dismissing anyone except as pointed out this report predicted $17 so their bias is clear.
First of all it was $19 and that was October 2016 in which there was still an overhang of old management.
Secondly the report on Skybet was quite thorough and while Dimitry Khmelnitsky isn't hot on the stock he continues to cover it with 10X more diligence than you ever have. He covered the sky acquisition positively in his previous report.
He overpenalizes non IFRS 'adjusted EBITDA' but that is no reason to toss the baby out with the bath water.
4) agree that we don’t know for sure, so let’s park this one and hope for the best . [/quote]
I really don't know what the stock will do if the judge announces a 54 million judgement against TSGI, will that really lead to a positive spike?