Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Mountain Province Diamonds Inc T.MPVD

Alternate Symbol(s):  MPVDF

Mountain Province Diamonds Inc. is a Canada-based diamond company. The Company’s primary asset is its 49% interest in the Gahcho Kue Mine, a Joint Venture with De Beers Canada. The Gahcho Kue Joint Venture property consists of several kimberlites that are actively being mined, developed, and explored for future development. The Company’s Kennady North Project includes approximately 113,000 hectares of claims and leases surrounding the Gahcho Kue Mine that include an indicated mineral resource for the Kelvin kimberlite and inferred mineral resources for the Faraday kimberlites. Kelvin is estimated to contain 13.62 million carats (Mct) at 8.50 million tons (Mt) at a grade of 1.60 carats/ton and a value of US$63/carat. Faraday 2 is estimated to contain 5.45Mct in 2.07Mt at a grade of 2.63 carats/ton and a value of US$140/ct. Faraday 1-3 is estimated to contain 1.90Mct to 1.87Mt at a grade of 1.04 carats/ton and a value of US$75/carat.


TSX:MPVD - Post by User

Post by tinytoton Oct 19, 2018 2:42pm
85 Views
Post# 28837218

A DUH moment for Tinytot

A DUH moment for TinytotThis is only about the specials.

For a brain laxative, assume a 50/50 split.

Assume we win the specials with a bid of $10.

We pay DeBeers $10, and they give us back $5.

We each paid half of their cost of production, so we can cancel that cost out and forget about it.

So forgetting about COP, DeBeers made $5 on the specials and they cost us $5.

Now if we can sell the specials for what we paid for them, which was $10, we will make $5, and break even with DeBeers.

If we can only sell the specials for $9, we will make $4, and DeBeers will have been the winner.

If we can sell the specials for $11, we will make $6, and it will have been a good deal by $1.

Interesting that if we can only sell the specials for half of what we paid, or $5, we will not lose on the sale, but DeBeers will be way ahead.

So what this tells me is that if we can sell the specials for as much as we paid for them, winning the bid was OK, and not a losing proposition. DUH, DUH, DUH.

That obvious point being said, we still need to know how much we paid for the specials AND how much we sold them for, before we can judge whether or not our bid was a smart/profit-maximizing one.
Bullboard Posts