Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Mountain Province Diamonds Inc T.MPVD

Alternate Symbol(s):  MPVDF

Mountain Province Diamonds Inc. is a Canada-based diamond company. The Company’s primary asset is its 49% interest in the Gahcho Kue Mine, a Joint Venture with De Beers Canada. The Gahcho Kue Joint Venture property consists of several kimberlites that are actively being mined, developed, and explored for future development. The Company’s Kennady North Project includes approximately 113,000 hectares of claims and leases surrounding the Gahcho Kue Mine that include an indicated mineral resource for the Kelvin kimberlite and inferred mineral resources for the Faraday kimberlites. Kelvin is estimated to contain 13.62 million carats (Mct) at 8.50 million tons (Mt) at a grade of 1.60 carats/ton and a value of US$63/carat. Faraday 2 is estimated to contain 5.45Mct in 2.07Mt at a grade of 2.63 carats/ton and a value of US$140/ct. Faraday 1-3 is estimated to contain 1.90Mct to 1.87Mt at a grade of 1.04 carats/ton and a value of US$75/carat.


TSX:MPVD - Post by User

Comment by tinytoton Oct 20, 2018 3:54pm
59 Views
Post# 28841375

RE:RE:RE:RE:A DUH moment for Tinytot

RE:RE:RE:RE:A DUH moment for Tinytot
Mauriceopp wrote: Tiny,

What you don't understand is the math behind it.

Please pick the following apart and show what I don't understand and where I am mistaken.

Although it is confusing, the specials are sold twice.

The first sale is by the losing bidder to the winning bidder.

The second sale is by the winning bidder to the buyers in Antwerp.

Adding to your confusion is the fact that the money paid to the winning bidder by the losing bidder is credited (deducted) to winning bidder's Cost of Sales account, while being added to the losers' Cost of Sales account.

So assuming a $10 winning bid, after the first sale, the loser shows Sales of $10, and a Cost of Sales of $5, while the winner shows $0 Sales and a Cost of Sales of $10 minus the $5 credit from the loser, or a net Cost of Sales of $5.

Now assume that the winner breaks even and sells in Antwerp for $10, his Sales are now $10 with a Cost of Sales of $5.

Their results are exactly the same.

And if the winner happened to only be able to get $9 for the specials in Antwerp, he would show fewer Sales than the loser's $10.
Bullboard Posts