Stockhouse.com uses cookies on this site. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies. Cookies are used to offer you a better browsing experience and to analyze our traffic. We also use them to share usage information with our partners. See full details.
I Agree
×
Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

Return to Login
SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Royal Nickel Corp. RNKLF

Metals & Mining Industrial Metals & Minerals


GREY:RNKLF - Post by User

Royal Nickel Corp. > trying to find out why "good" report pushed RNX down.
<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
User Avatar Image
(0)
•••
Comment by BASTILLEDAY4Uon Oct 24, 2018 4:26pm
161 Views
Post# 28866850

RE:trying to find out why "good" report pushed RNX down.

RE:trying to find out why "good" report pushed RNX down.Th eproblem is your 6.67 g/t may have been for a 1 quarter time period only and not over a longer period as say a Red Lake or Campbell gold mine which averaged 22 grams per tonne and returned 22 million ounces their lifetimes.
<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities