Nemaska Lithium Inc NMKEF

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:10 for 1 Share Consolidation

[Metalhead99]

I don't really understand why you worded your post as you did. You basically said, "good points, BUT(suggesting disagreement), and then went on to agree with me. I also stated that I don't think they need any additional institutional investment. They have the funding, I wrote. All they have to do is stick to their timeline, I wrote. Like you, I don't know why some character here is going on and on about consolidation, and the need to get the share price over $5 so that more institutional money can come in. 

mick1888 wrote: As good as the points you have both made, I would have thought that if there was no additional institutional investors within the next year, why would NMX particularly need to court them after that period? After all, they have all the funding required to get the mine and the chemical plant up and running, and they will be in profit 2020 (mine) and 2022 (chemical plant). So what would the benefit be in dilution when in the future NMX could be reducing their shares with the exceptional profits they will be achieving? 

Metalhead99 wrote: I like your last post. There does not seem to be any reason to consolidate at the moment. They have a decent amount of financial support already from big players. With the funding they have, the only thing they need to focus on or worry about at the moment is keeping to their timeline. 

Also, look what consolidation did for LAC when they did it to get listed in the U.S. and to attract investment. They have yet to "attract" much, and their SP has been sliding to nowhere just like every other lithium stock in 2018. When a company consolidates shares to get the SP above $5, and does it in the wrong market environment, it is a waste of time or even harmful because it doesn't take long for the SP to fall below the magic $5-level anyway. 

Haiabusa wrote: Certain institutional investors and mutual funds have a rule that they can’t invest in a stock priced less than 5$. Management, has fiduciary duty to maximize shareholder value as well as they receive compensation from share options which will become in the money as more investors get onside.

I think you are right that they will do it, but now isn’t the right time - no catalysts working for them yet until they prove some financials.

It’ll be quiet until 2019 Q2/3, then we start moving to $1 if all’s on track.