Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Rochester Resources Ltd V.RCT

Alternate Symbol(s):  RCTFF

Rochester Resources Ltd. is a Canada-based company engaged in the exploration and development of its mineral property interests in Mexico. The Company holds a 100% interest in the Mina Real and San Francisco Properties, which are located in the state of Nayarit, Mexico, east of the state capital city of Tepic. In addition, the Company has an agreement to acquire a 70% interest in the Santa Fe Property. The Mina Real Property consists of 11 mining concessions and one mineral claim encompassing a total area of over 21,367.42 hectares (ha). The contiguous Santa Fe Property consists of one mining concession totaling approximately 3,852.66 ha. The San Francisco Property consists of 12 mining concessions encompassing over 18,125.05 ha. Its subsidiaries include ALB Holdings Ltd., Mina Real Mexico S.A. de C.V. and Compania Minera Santa Fe S.A. de C.V.


TSXV:RCT - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by POG1200on Mar 04, 2019 2:04am
263 Views
Post# 29436639

RE:going concern risk

RE:going concern risk

Scary going concern.  Their costs are very high right now, $1700+/ounce, but they still produce a tiny bit of gold and silver, albeit at a loss...  They warn about how the preliminary ore assessments were not conducted, but they ran into usable grades building roads... I think there's really good deposits on their properties. I think they are sandbagging for a better price in gold. They can lower their costs even raise capital, but are blase on it with the price of gold being what it is. There's only a little over 22M shares out after investors lost their leverage after the 10:1 reverse split. If there were demand for a profitable, penny producer the share price would go up very fast with only that many shares out... JMO, I'm not any kind of metals/economist expert, but I do know some things...

They've been keeping this thing going for a long time, probably to keep the locals employed while establishing a tax write-off for the insiders when they want to use it - or it becomes profitable with a much higher price of gold...  One thing is for sure, the US dollar will be an issue down the road as the deficit continues to soar upwards. 

It's a crazy world that says the deficit doesn't matter.  Most are managing their wealth as though it doesn't - and for now, they are right. Interest rates are low, and as long as the US can meet the interest payment on the deficit it is not an issue, but someday the size of that interest payment is going to be in the media spotlight, and maybe because the US is struggling with its size... When that happens, (and you can't fight the math - it will happen,) we will be in the midst of a crisis due to the recognition that the US deficit is no longer tolerable. 

When? who knows, but those that have spoken of astronomical prices for gold are referring to this type of crisis.  Anything gold becomes a good hold should that ever happen.  I know one economist that says maybe in 5 years...

I wonder if the deficit becomes an issue this coming presidential election. Trump has spent such that the deficit has broken 22 trillion dollars now... Will anyone address the meaning of a US deficit that continues to increase more and more as time goes on...?

One other thing: investment advisors that put retirement plans together that don't include the tradition 10% gold insurance/protection are doing the clients a tremendous disservice. The various retirement-planning institutions returning to including the traditional 10% gold holding could impact the gold-stock market tremendously, since I think there are a lot of those institutions that greedily let go of including gold in client portfolios in favor of earning interest in other sectors. That trend ought to be changing back to holding gold now, if for no other reason than realizing the current administration is increasing the deficit more than the previous one, which increased the size of the deficit more than all previous administrations combined, largely due to 2008 being the year when the banking system teetered on collapse...

In these times, knowing what we know, I'd stay away from any investment advisors who don't insist on at least 10% gold as being part of their client's portfolios. This is "a word" that every gold advocate out to spread. This advice is prudent and gold-stock, share-price positive.

Bullboard Posts