Stockhouse.com uses cookies on this site. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies. Cookies are used to offer you a better browsing experience and to analyze our traffic. We also use them to share usage information with our partners. See full details.
I Agree
×
Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

Return to Login
SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

UEX Corp UEXCF

Metals & Mining Industrial Metals & Minerals


GREY:UEXCF - Post by User

UEX Corp > Dont look impressive.
<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
User Avatar Image
(11)
•••
Comment by norontrules1234on Mar 18, 2019 12:06pm
72 Views
Post# 29500793

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Dont look impressive.

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Dont look impressive.Don't you find it odd that Roger decided, just now, to finally look at the old sonic results?  Why wasn't this done previously and disseminated to shareholders?  Another oversight?  Smart?  Seems 'hoodwinkish' to me at best. If it was an oversight, shame on Roger once again.  If he purposely held them back, why, and is that really fair to shareholders?
<< Previous
 Bullboard Posts
Next >>
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities