Tinley Beverage Company Inc C.TNY

Alternate Symbol(s): TNYBF

The Tinley Beverage Company Inc., together with its subsidiaries, manufactures a line of non-alcoholic, cannabis-infused beverages for use in California, United States and in Ontario, Canada. The Company also manufactures cannabis-infused beverages for contract manufacturing clients. It offers terpene and cannabis-infused non-alcoholic Tinley's '27 and Tinley's Tonics products, for distribution to licensed dispensaries and home delivery channels in California. The Beckett's Classics and Beckett's '27 lines of non-alcoholic, terpene-infused non-cannabis versions of these formulations are available in select mainstream food, beverage, and specialty retailers in the United States as well as in select grocery and specialty stores in Canada. Its subsidiaries include Hemplify Inc., Algonquin Springs Beverage Management LLC, Beckett’s Tonics California Inc., Beckett's Tonics Canada Inc., Tinley's Canada Inc., and Lakewood Libations Inc.

CSE:TNY - Post by User

Tinley Beverage Company Inc

Bullboard Posts

Comment by KingKongon Dec 18, 2019 11:01am

121 Views

Post# 30468165

RE:RE:The bears still have

Once again geo, i think you get the picture after this time hopefully... Pure manipulation or price supression for whatever reason..

House Positions for C:TNY from 20191218 to 20191218

House	Bought	$Val	Ave	Sold	$Val	Ave	Net	$Net
79 CIBC	27,700	10,862	0.392	0			27,700	-10,862
83 Mackie	17,000	6,765	0.398	0			17,000	-6,765
7 TD Sec	8,120	3,282	0.404	0			8,120	-3,282
33 Canaccord	7,500	3,018	0.402	0			7,500	-3,018
85 Scotia	5,250	2,075	0.395	0			5,250	-2,075
2 RBC	9,000	3,565	0.396	4,122	1,607	0.39	4,878	-1,958
36 Latimer	0			570	227	0.398	-570	227
1 Anonymous	34,122	13,575	0.398	104,000	41,308	0.397	-69,878	27,733
TOTAL	108,692	43,142	0.397	108,692	43,142	0.397	0	0

It's basically a repeat of yesterday, there's not really any shareholders giving up their shares, on the contrary excluding Anonymous.

KingKong wrote:

geodcan wrote:
When shareholders have had enough and won't give up their shares, the bleeding will stop and the price will firm up and hopefully appreciate on real fundamentals of which Tinley has plenty.

Here's another prime example of how it's not shareholders giving up shares, it's simply anon with the majority of negative net selling, causing the illusion that's it's retailers panicing etc.

House Positions for C:TNY from 20191217 to 20191217

House Bought $Val Ave Sold $Val Ave Net $Net

83 Mackie 10,500 3,972 0.378 0 10,500 -3,972

2 RBC 6,000 2,270 0.378 1,000 385 0.385 5,000 -1,885

9 BMO Nesbitt 5,000 1,875 0.375 0 5,000 -1,875

79 CIBC 1,554 598 0.385 0 1,554 -598

85 Scotia 3,689 1,408 0.382 2,540 952 0.375 1,149 -456

89 Raymond James 650 249 0.383 0 650 -249

88 Credential 600 231 0.385 0 600 -231

13 Instinet 1,000 375 0.375 1,000 380 0.38 0 5

36 Latimer 40 15 0.375 843 322 0.382 -803 307

1 Anonymous 3,500 1,330 0.38 27,150 10,284 0.379 -23,650 8,954

TOTAL 32,533 12,323 0.379 32,533 12,323 0.379 0

Latimer is -803 net for selling today, that's possibly a retailer, but that's the only negative net seller besides Anonymous, which sold -23,650 net!

It's clear as day, one or more institutions shorting to surpress the price for a hostile takeover, or they're playing both sides of the fence, who knows, but to suggest that when shareholders stop giving up their shares the bleeding will stop is nonsense, lol...

House	Bought	$Val	Ave	Sold	$Val	Ave	Net	$Net
83 Mackie	10,500	3,972	0.378	0		10,500	-3,972
2 RBC	6,000	2,270	0.378	1,000	385	0.385	5,000	-1,885
9 BMO Nesbitt	5,000	1,875	0.375	0		5,000	-1,875
79 CIBC	1,554	598	0.385	0		1,554	-598
85 Scotia	3,689	1,408	0.382	2,540	952	0.375	1,149	-456
89 Raymond James	650	249	0.383	0		650	-249
88 Credential	600	231	0.385	0		600	-231
13 Instinet	1,000	375	0.375	1,000	380	0.38	0	5
36 Latimer	40	15	0.375	843	322	0.382	-803	307
1 Anonymous	3,500	1,330	0.38	27,150	10,284	0.379	-23,650	8,954
TOTAL	32,533	12,323	0.379	32,533	12,323	0.379	0