GREY:VITFF - Post by User
Comment by
NickelOneon Feb 09, 2020 9:38pm
109 Views
Post# 30665187
RE:RE:RE:RE:Feb presentation and differences to Jan
RE:RE:RE:RE:Feb presentation and differences to JanMVargas wrote: Finally a recognition that it was Kinross that dumped their position last summer as they have been removed from the list of major shareholders.
Looks like Nickel has flipped yet again.
Kinross did not invest in VIT for their Yukon properties. Back in 2008 Kinross owned more than 34% of VIT\s outstanding shares, and Nevada properties owned by VIT were of interest for Kinross. Yukon property was aquired by VIT in 2009.
Kinross "dumped" VIT back in 2012, as their involvement with VIT was non-existent and their ownership in VIT was diluted over the years to an insignificant 6.5%.
It looks like MVargas just had a 'revelation', late as always...