GREY:LXXGQ - Post by User
Comment by
Investor62on Apr 15, 2020 9:38am
68 Views
Post# 30911068
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:new video on twitter 56 mins ago
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:new video on twitter 56 mins agoIntelligent??
did you read what you sent to the last lines?
However, an ideal test would analyze blood samples instead of saliva, which is more accurate as it’s less likely to miss the virus. Also, a blood test can measure a patient’s immune response to COVID-19 to see if they’ve built up resistance to future infections — something the new Rutgers test can’t do.
But in the absence of widely-distributed blood tests, the merits of a saliva test over nasal swabs stand to benefit lots of people — and could help the country get a better grip on this outbreak.
Definitely no competition for what Lexagene is doing. Just to make the president happy