RE:RE:Pot Drink FrustrationsHere's an idea ... Instead of blaming HC, how about SPR actually close on one of the +15 milestones they've mentioned over the last 2yrs. Then maybe others will take notice. Partners, other jurisdictions, bottling facility, patents are but a few things that are independent.
SUMKNDV1DERFL wrote: RetiringYoung wrote: Pot-infused drink players frustrated by regulations limiting beverage purchases
Government restrictions on legal cannabis possession limits are creating a headache for producers of infused beverages, Yahoo Finance Reports. Current regulations apparently favour higher-potency drinks while restricting sales of mellower products, the website reports. With "Cannabis 2.0" products sold with dried flower equivalents, Canadians may find they're often limited to how much of these drinks they can purchase at one time. Companies such as Canopy Growth and Hexo are lobbying Ottawa to change regulations, but it might be a few years until that takes place.
Here is the link to the full article. Good read and prime example how Canadian Government is fouling up what could be a successful precedence around the world, not too mention an extremely lucrative one for investors.
Perhaps Ford will at some point abandon his horizontal management style and begin to listen to consumers and producers. If his brother were still around, crack would be the next item up for legalization. A buck a bud to match his buck a beer lobbying??!!
Some reasonable governing and corrections to recent roll out oversight that does not stiffle a bourgeoning industry would be much appreciated across the market.
https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/ottawas-backwards-limit-on-pot-drinks-is-having-unintended-consequences-producers-warn-161359677.html