Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Kelt Exploration Ltd T.KEL

Alternate Symbol(s):  KELTF

Kelt Exploration Ltd oil and gas company. The Company is focused on the exploration, development and production of crude oil and natural gas resources in northwestern Alberta and northeastern British Columbia. The Company's assets are comprised of three operating divisions: Wembley/Pipestone in Alberta; Pouce Coupe/Progress/Spirit River in Alberta, and Oak/Flatrock in British Columbia. The Company’s British Columbia assets are operated by Kelt Exploration (LNG) Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.


TSX:KEL - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by pablo87on Aug 19, 2020 6:13pm
115 Views
Post# 31430963

RE:Going once, Going twice......Gone!

RE:Going once, Going twice......Gone!As an investor, my investment thesis starts with good management of course. But also, it seems there should be a shift away from reserves as a (exit) strategy in order to focus on cashflow.  First, that will hopefully translate into spending less on infrastructure and delineation and more on drilling and completion.  Second, if they can buy equivalent asset and reserves for less, that works too. Third, a merger or acquisition is not a bad idea to increase size and scope and reduce costs (the future is not bright for small niche players it seems). Or all three.

Since they will have ~$200M cash to work with post closing (exclding debentures and working capital deficiency) and no bank debt, it seems they will be in an enviable position relative to most of their peers.  A lot of them can't capex that much even if they wanted to given their limited access to credit.

GLTA.
Bullboard Posts