RE:RE:RE:RE:.27 GRAMS PER TON ?????mrbubba wrote: Fine, but you're still not responding to the math of Bowie/Krush - they're math looks correct to me. Converting cubic meters to tons is not responsive to their initial post.
And, has Kirkland Lake officially stated that they believe the Egina is not what it's cracked up to be? Have they stated a reason why they sold, other than they might need the money for another project?
I converted to tonnes because I know grades per tonne, not in meters, because thats how mining contractors work, based on a scale, not the size of a pile or a hole in the ground. I am a contractor. It is also how nvo will pay their contractors unless they plan on doing it themselves. And it will not be economic. Tell that to Bowie and Captn Crunch who know nothing about anything along with everyone else on that board.
Kl has 1$B in the bank and no debt. They arent selling because they thought nvo was going to be wildly economic I can tell you that much.
R