RE:RE:RE:Backwards SpeculatorWeedTheNorth wrote: Thats a fair strategy, it sounds like we won't be fellow shareholders ever again if you're waiting for lower.
The socialists tax to provide the same services without running up massive debt. If you spend 100 but insist on only collect 10 in tax, you end up borrowing 90. Socialists want to collect 100 to pay 100
Rotaluceps wrote: WeedTheNorth wrote: Rotaluceps, neat name. Make a prediction, I've only seen you deny other opinions, what do you think? Answer here please for easy recall - I meet so many of you clowns I can't dig back later.
Deny, or having a different opinion that don't fit yours? You can't be serious, look at the Democrat run states. If they collect more tax, it will be to spend for the people, but these are taxes that the MJ companies will have to pay = less revenue. Look at California for example. I was about to forget that we are clowns, wow!
California lawmakers say pot taxes must be cut to help an industry ‘on the brink’
California’s legal market has not grown as expected, a problem the cannabis industry and some state officials have attributed to factors including high taxes, bureaucratic red tape and the fact that three-quarters of California cities have banned pot shops. https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-01-17/california-lower-pot-taxes-gavin-newsom