RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:October 6th
CamaroZL1 wrote: Problem Stocky is your inability to comprehend, and your memory sucks that is a sign of IQ my friend. You think vst will sink on a single linear cause (HC approval) nothing works that way. you blab a lot about valuation and yet you are long from 77 cents? Have you ever looked at standard deviation? You bought where there was a 98% probability the price would return to the mean. Sorry my background in statistics talking.
It's not my memory that sucks bud. It's actually very clear that yours does. Every time you say I said something which I obviously didn't I ask you to show me and you just can't because what you claim never happened. I don't get a peep out of you (this is a great thing). I'm not sure if it's a memory issue or if you're delusional.
I have shown clear outright lies and contradictions from your end and the proof of it but all you've done is resort to name calling like a child. Well done, very mature.
Here's another one. Earlier you were claiming that I said what I did because I'm short on VST which counters what I told you my position is. Then when you saw it drop like a rock you stopped saying that. Interesting. It seems like you'll tell yourself anything so you can believe I lose. My guess is that when/if VST rises significantly, you'll flip AGAIN and start saying I'm short on VST just so you can tell yourself I lose. No consistency, facts, or logic from your end.
This post of yours makes absolutely no sense either. It's like you're trying to throw out buzz words to get people to believe you know what you're talking about but you're not even using them correctly. Asking if I think I stock will sink on a linear cause? That question makes no sense. If you're asking if I think a stock could sink based on a SINGLE cause then yes, that's undoubtedly the case. One example is earnings. If a company misses their earnings projections it sinks. HC approval is related to VST earnings so it's very likely that if they don't get that approval, they miss their earnings and they sink.
I can't claim to be an expert in statistics but I did study it a little bit in university so I would say my stats knowledge is above average. Given that you're using basic terminology incorrectly, I'm honestly doubtful that you have a stats background. Unfortunately I can't prove this because you're improper use of stats terms could be due to a wide variety of reasons (your poor memory for example).