RE:RE:RE:RE:When I muse of Tesla and HPQ it goes like this...Aarman4 wrote: Opinion: I hope like hell this NEVER happens.
It is fun to come up with all sorts of scenarios in the future, but the best case scenario for me is that HPQ maximizes it's returns every step of the way. HPQ Nano has been promised to Pyrogenesis to the tune of 50%. What this does is creates a situation where a takeover is only possible if Pyrogenesis wants them to. Now, as an owner of HPQ, and an owner of Pyrogenesis, I do not want to sell out for a mere few bags above the current price. NO THANKS.
I want to be sittin ghere, 15 years from now, still seeing major gains as my shares of HPQ continue growing as they use the money they earn from all sales to ALL CUSTOMERS, to taking over the world nano-silicon market, followed by the world's nano-every other damn thing market. 4 or 10 bags is not enough.
Let's think like owners, because we are. Our goal is not a quick buck, it is a lifetime income stream.
Cheers!
dougkimbrough wrote: Opinions please. I know everyone will not agree but please add to it because we own the company and they do read this. If they like things we post they may try it. We will not know unless we speak our mind. We're not in charge of anything to do with hpq but they can read and make decisions just as we did when we invested.
my opinion is that PYR made the 50% ownership option of HPQ in the event it starts to become big business and big money....at that point it will be PYR who buys them out. PYR has trade secrets involved intrinsically with HPQs designs of thier purevap and purevap nano so to allow another company to buy HPQ would be allowing thier technology to be analyzed and reproduced by another company. Something that I suspect Peter would not allow under any circumstance....just my 2 cents
Regarda