RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:FYIIncorrect. You are misquoting me in entirety . I never said the order would be just one or two torches. I stated a company WILL spend a $billion dollars to change out their fossil fuel burners.
I am not wrong yet wrinkle nuts. I have decided to make you my special project girl.
You do not own own one single share of this company. You work for entities that short and naked short equities that destroy corporations. Nobody who owned stock in a company would crappp on their investment the way you do. You... are a fraud.
canyousayiii wrote: Ghostman, well, that would be factually inaccurate. I think you should be quiet given that you backtracked on your statement about a billion dollar check being nothing for a company and then later saying that nobody with half a brain would expect something like that. And that you also said that there was no way that the first order would be just 1 or 2 torches and took shots at those suggestions, only for Peter to later on effectively say that the expectations you put out and defended through insulting others were not of the right mind. But if you wish to take a shot at an opinion that is more bullish for PYR than one published in a formal publication, go ahead. I think a pumper with more than half a brain would not do that, but you are free to express an opinion to the contrary. Hope you had good holidays.
Casavantsghost wrote: CanSoupy, you should put an order in tomorrow and sell the shares you do not own.
canyousayiii wrote: But there is no indepth analysis. Just summarizing what happened in 2020 and no attempt to quantify any potential sales for any of the business lines. A real analysis would produce a bunch of financial statements for several years out under informed assumptions. Here we got if the share price rises over $6.15, it could go over $7. I am expecting over $7 if we start selling just some torches to two big clients. Not 100 torches but somewhere in double digits.