RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:A sad sad sad reality....Bevcanna has announced Q1 for the relae of Keef in Canada as well as their own drinks to folow shortly aftr, likely in Q1. Their license is expected anyday now.
Bev has done trial runs of their Keef and Bev drinks and have done their NCCP, I believe.
As for heir US drinks, Bev will use Keefs manufacturing, distribution and network of over 1000 dispensaries.
As for timelines that you are so adament about, how has Tinley done with timelines? NR's? Communication, execution.
You are so stuck on waving your Tinley pom poms and attacking anyone that even discusses Bev yet the proof is in the SP of both. Investors have flocked to Bev as they are well informed and executing on their plans. Just look at the volumes of the 2 companies of late. Tinley in the 1000's and Bev in the millions
We get it, you love Tinley and will defend them to the deeath even though they are really not giving us any reason to defend their actions because of their missed timelines, lack of commnication, lack of execution and total radio silence. We can only hope that solence is due to an institutional buy in.
Today while the MJ space goes off, we still can't break the .45 level where the last PP was done at.
quote=scotianbot]
Cool story, you didn't provide any dates to the specific questions I asked regarding when BevCanna will have their license in Canada, or, when Keef and BevCanna will have drinks on shelves in the Canadian market....
You wrote that long post but forgot the most basic "information" you said Tinley is lacking....
The same goes for Canopy, when is their Hemp bottling facility going to be licensed in Modesto?
Once again, I'll wait.......
I'll get a Tinley news release before I get a straight answer out of you on this specific topic.... Diana420 wrote: Investors have a simple choice - to invest or not to invest. Decisions to invest are assisted by knowing what is working in a company. A company asking people to continue investing when milestone after milestone have been missed takes a whole lot more effort then offering more fluffy NRs and hopeful forward statements full of the conditional voice.
LIke you, I look at and invest in other companies, but I seldom mention other companies, which you frequently do.
When I mentioned Bevcanna, it was within context and was far from a pump. As it happens, I agree with your assessment and have given you a thumb's up when you outlined your thoughts on a few occasions. Aside from their debt load, their location is far from ideal. The road is hell in the summer and in the winters it frequently becomes impassable. Plus the wild fires... I do, however, like the information they provide, including updates to address expectations of investors.
I also mentioned Molecule in the same message for two reasons: 1) their business model is the closest I have seen to Tinley's, so the comparison is an easy one to make 2) the excellent job they do at communicating to manage new investors' expectations. On the negative side, they are very new, and they carry significant debt. In other words, a huge gamble. On the plus side, their execution of milestones is impressive for a small company and they share when they achieve their milestones, not when they are going to start working on them. They even address the negative - managing old debt from their previous entity.
Canopy and Hexo don't need to coax investors. WEED is the best symbol on the market. I would never compare Tinley's to them, and until now, have never mentioned those companies, and likely wont again, because they don't fit in the same category.
And yes, Scotianbot, we do look at it differently. I bought in four years ago, and find the prolonged timelines disheartening. My rose coloured glasses got knocked off this autumn, but for some strange reason, I remain cautiously optimistic.
[/quote]