RE:RE:RE:booyahFor gods sake man, no one is arguing with you that stock dropped from $.14 to $0.065. Exactly how many times do you have to say that and I have to agree with you before you can let that point go as the truism that it is. But when you say that 90% of the time since hitting bottom this stock has finished in the red you are wildly incorrect. It has been in a sideways trading range since Dec.22, when it hit the low of $0.065. Below is the data. You will notice that on all the trading days since Dec. 22, a total of 11 trading days, the stock has finished in the red 3 times, or 27.27%. I would be very happy to round up to 90% for you if it will save having to hearing more on the subject from you. I can't tell if you are one of the stupidest people I have ever had the misfortune to meet or if you are just paid to bash. My guess is the later because I am naturally suspicious, because even when i agree with you relentlessly you still want to argue, and finally because I have a hard time believing that there is someone as stupid as you in this realm. I think you almost have to pretend to be that stupid. Pretending you are stupid possibly gives you an excuse to keep posting the same bearish points, over and over again, and saying the same factually incorrect things over and over again. But I could be wrong. You might actually be an utter dolt.
Dec 23: closed green
Dec.24; closed flat
Dec.29: closeed flat
Dec.30: closed flat
Dec.31: closed red
Jan.4: closed red
Jan.5: closed red Jan.6: cosed green
Jan.7: closed flat
Jan.8: closed flat
Jan.11: closed flat
Date | Open | High | Low | Close* | Adj Close** | Volume |
Jan. 11, 2021 | 0.0750 | 0.0750 | 0.0650 | 0.0700 | 0.0700 | 4,105,194 |
Jan. 08, 2021 | 0.0800 | 0.0800 | 0.0700 | 0.0750 | 0.0750 | 4,460,085 |
Jan. 07, 2021 | 0.0750 | 0.0850 | 0.0700 | 0.0750 | 0.0750 | 4,879,368 |
Jan. 06, 2021 | 0.0700 | 0.0850 | 0.0700 | 0.0750 | 0.0750 | 6,219,832 |
Jan. 05, 2021 | 0.0750 | 0.0750 | 0.0650 | 0.0700 | 0.0700 | 3,256,757 |
Jan. 04, 2021 | 0.0800 | 0.0800 | 0.0700 | 0.0750 | 0.0750 | 4,184,042 |
Dec. 31, 2020 | 0.0800 | 0.0800 | 0.0700 | 0.0800 | 0.0800 | 3,725,244 |
Dec. 30, 2020 | 0.0850 | 0.0850 | 0.0750 | 0.0850 | 0.0850 | 4,161,602 |
Dec. 29, 2020 | 0.0850 | 0.0950 | 0.0800 | 0.0850 | 0.0850 | 5,553,437 |
Dec. 24, 2020 | 0.0850 | 0.0900 | 0.0800 | 0.0850 | 0.0850 | 2,409,915 |
Dec. 23, 2020 | 0.0750 | 0.0900 | 0.0700 | 0.0850 | 0.0850 | 9,987,677 |
Dec. 22, 2020 | 0.0900 | 0.0900 | 0.0650 | 0.0750 | 0.0750 | 14,173,148 |
Lowfloatmining1 wrote: Well 90% of the time from the dump it closed red so yeah from .14 to .065 is going down. These few days it managed to go up was shot right back down... but in your accredited trading career that's all positive.
facts hurt little buddy you can spin it anyway you like the numbers don't lie.
Pending news like you say could be good or could be bad. Nobody knows. I would expect the company to release something tomorrow pre market if not then that is troubling.
flip a coin it's a penny stock who's expanding but has yet to show a positive cash flow.
SamRothstein wrote: I guess you use the same special and private dictionary as lowfloat. I use the standard english definition of "going down ever since" to mean exactly that. and yet in last 3 weeks the stock price has not gone below its Dec.22 low of $.065, and has gone as high at $0.09. It has averaged around $0.075 to $0.08 during last 3 weeks. But I guess for you and lowfloat "going down ever since" means something else. It is nice that you can both agree on non-standard definitions of words. That is a friend you should hold onto.
LionWhisperer wrote: I noticed here on stockhouse it staes halted by company pending news.Just admiting what I see.Regardless it cant be good as shareprice going down ever since CEO sold 3 million shares at 12 cents.Boy is he a good trader