Pharmadrug Inc C.PHRX

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:LOL

[SamRothstein]

Wonderful.  No need for further discussion.

Lowfloatmining1 wrote: Im not booing the investors just the lying pumpers.  Not booing the company either just showing both sides of the coin as there are two sides.  

What people do here is none of my concern... buy -sell it's not up to me.  I could say the same about you and your specialty about pumping stocks but when questioned you resort to attacking and accusing people of being paid bashers.  Grow up and look at both the positive and negative about a company to make a sound judgment.  You refuse to be open to that discussion.

You reply but when asked a question you see doesn't fit with your agenda all of a sudden your not interested in my nonsense. Typical no knowledge pumper.

My opinion about you doesn't matter and falls on deaf ears anyway.  Regardless of what I think I do wish you success in buzz and your other stocks just be honest with people. Don't sugar coat sh!t.
 

 

SamRothstein wrote: Not interested in your opininon or you questions.  I'm done wasting time refuting your nonsense..  You can buy, sell, or your specialty, just sit on the sidelines and boo the company and the investors.   i don't care what you think or do.  
 

 

Lowfloatmining1 wrote:

You lead people to think you know a lot more than you actually do.  When you're questioned with a simple answer you resort to bs comments.  

You're going to educate me on Acb and booth LOL! seriously laughing at your ignorance.   

Like I said these sectors are pumps and dumps and I play the trend.  

Unlike you who even after a 30-40% day is at best even.  

Go ahead repeat 10-20 times how I'm a basher for pointing out actual concerns.  It's not bashing if it's true.  

This new acquisition cost the current shareholder 75million shares on top of a bloated float. Is that me bashing or is that a fact? 

What is a fair value of the newly acquired company? 

 

 

 

SamRothstein wrote: I think if you can repeat these same points enough, but in slightly differnent ways (don't just copy and paste) enough times then you might convince some people.  I would recommend 10-20 times a day.   Keep up the good work!
 

 

Lowfloatmining1 wrote:

Ah here you are again ignoring the question.  I've listed all the reasons Booth had nothing to do with the rise in Acb share prices yet you can't provide ONE to support your argument.  I'm not disputing that the weed sector had a massive upswing but that was thanks to the institutions who pumped the sector only to short it the day of legalization.  

IMO Booth was bad for Acb with his overspending and paying ridiculous valuations using shares.  How can you possibly say Booth caused Acb to rise 400+% when that same ceo caused BILLIONS in write downs followed by a RS... 

Booth refused to have a partner who would have infused billions to grow the company instead he issued shares.  He was the king of dilution so imo he wasn't the cause of the rise more like the fall of Acb. 

 

 

SamRothstein wrote: Not going to argue with you as to whether Booth was good or not as you don't think he had anything to do with a 454% rise in 6 months.  This reminds me of when i encounter one of the flat earth people, or people that don't believe in evolution.  I'm not going to waste my time trying to educate you as you don't want to learn, you want to be right.  So go ahead and be right.  
 

 

Lowfloatmining1 wrote:

Ok since we agree that booth diluted Acb beyond belief and overpaid for every purchase which caused billions in write downs why is Booth good?
What did Booth do exactly to drive the price of Acb? I say nothing... 
My point is it was the institutions who pumped the stock pre legalization only to dump and go short the day of legalization. Also it was Cam Batley who did the pumping for Acb ... Every time booth spoke it resulted in a market sell off for Acb. 

 Not to mention all the dilution he caused he also dumped 70% of his shares.  How's that for a good ceo.  I was involved in the weed sector... not from the very beginning but early enough to have walked away in the plus.  Sold because I saw the issues which are very similar to what is happening with buzz.  Overspending and using shares to buy companies at ridiculous valuations. 

 

SamRothstein wrote: I'm not ignoring anything.  Again, you are arguing on points where there is no disagreement.
We do disagree on whether the 454% rise in 6 months had anything to do with Booth.  And that is fine, we can agree to disagree. 

 

 

Lowfloatmining1 wrote:

The move for Acb has nothing to do with Booth Jesus man.  If you followed that sector you would know that.  

There was a reason Cam the Scam Batley was doing 99% of the interviews because when Booth spoke it was nothing but red for the stock.  

Why are you ignoring the fact that Booth diluted Acb to over a billion shares, overpaid for every aqusition with shares of course which ended up in billions of write downs.  How are those good things?

Again, the entire weed sector was pumped by institutions.  Booth had nothing to do with it other than over promise and under deliver... meaning he lied.  

 

SamRothstein wrote: So the 454% move up in 6 months had nothing to do with Booth?  We are going to have to agreee to disagree on that.   That assertion alone provides enough of a spotlight on your level of acumen to fully discount anything that you say.   You don't need to worry about big bad Booth anyways, as you say you don't even have a position.     
 

 

Lowfloatmining1 wrote:

Boith did not drive the stock 400%+ the entire sector was pumped by institutions! Which included acb... Booth did nothing other than dilute.  If you're going to say anyone helped Acb with the pump it was Cam Batlwy he was a good bullish!tter with promises which were all lies.  There's a reason Cam was sent packing along with Booth! 

 

SamRothstein wrote: You keep arguing points that no one is arguing.  Never said psych is same or will be as big as jm sector.  Never said that mj company valuations weren't crazy high, which is why later sharply corrected, with write downs etc.  Where we disagree is on whether it is a bad thing if a dealmaker like Booth drives a stock up 454% in 6 months.  I think that is a very good thing, at least for my purpose.  I'm not planning on marrying BUZZ.  
 

 

Lowfloatmining1 wrote:

No lying clown I don't think pp are bad I said Pps that are issued at less than current market cap are bad because they are dilution.  Money raised at current market value doesn't dilute but it still adds to the float.

You are the biggest clown here worse than fishcat if you are in anyway saying booth is somehow a good advisor.  He didn't do a damn thing for Acb! Other than dilute it to 1 billion shares by overpaying for every acquisition only to eventually sell those for a massive loss. The entire sector was pumped by institutions and by the likes of Cam Batley with promises for huge partnerships which were all BS.  I don't see institutions pumping this sector and I'm pretty sure investors see through the BS.

The entire weed sector was so overvalued it was laughable.  All had huge hopes only to fall on their face once reality hit.  Billions of dollars in write downs, reverse splits and of course terrible sales and that was weed and edibles.  Buzz is in an even bigger niche market with a lot less demand. 

How many large scale producers who received billions from large partnership deals are barely keeping the lights on and they actually have sales.
Buzz on the other hand has what exactly? At this point not a whole lot.

I know you're a pumper maybe even paid to promise sh!t who knows.  You are comparing buzz to the weed sector lol! Get real! 

 

SamRothstein wrote: We all know you think private placements are bad, issuing stock to do a deal is bad, Terry booth is bad, and that Booth destroyed ACC.  The fact is that Booth took ACB from $2.43 on Aug.21, 2017 to $13.48 on Jan 15 , 2018.  That is a 454.73% return in 6 months.  I know you consider that a failure because the stock (along with entire mj sector ) corrected sharply after that parabolic rise.  We are going to have to agree to disagree on this point.  I consider a 454% return in six months to be a good thing, at least for my purpose, and I welcome you to continue to consider that a failure.  


 

 

Lowfloatmining1 wrote:

Hey pumpers how does it feel that the company just issued another 75million shares to an already bloated float? 

Spend away using shares but don't worry about making some actual money. This was the material news right fishcat... you said they were going to release news about their new superstore instead they used shares to buy another company. 

Wonder if this has terry booths finger prints on it. This is exactly what he did with Acb and diluted that company to oblivion. Over pay for everything with shares! 

Let's see how you clowns will spin this.