Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

St James Gold Corp V.LORD

Alternate Symbol(s):  LRDJF

St. James Gold Corp. is engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral resource properties located in Canada. The Company holds a 100-per-cent stake in 29 claims, covering 1,791 acres, in the Gander gold district in north-central Newfoundland located adjacent to New Found Gold Corp.’s Queensway North project; and a 100-per-cent stake in nine claims and an option to acquire a further 100-per-cent interest in 19 claims, covering a total 1,730 acres, in central Newfoundland located adjacent to Marathon Gold's Valentine Lake property. Its Grub Line property is located 3.5 kilometers west of the town of Gander, NL. The Quinn Lake Property comprises two contiguous mineral licenses totaling 700 hectares (ha).


TSXV:LORD - Post by User

Post by gold_strikeon Jan 26, 2021 10:54am
212 Views
Post# 32386997

No buyer base

No buyer base
I have noticed during this run up in price that the buyers appear to be a controlled or select group.   Does anyone else reach that conclusion?   There is no large base of bids waiting to buy on a continuous basis anywhere near the current price that I can assertain.   Not saying there is anything illegal going on, but I noticed this morning that there was nothing above a 45 cent bid or maybe even a lot lower, except for a bid and ask that appeared to be in tandem at 46 cents and then a couple other prices before both finally settling at 72 cents.    Is one hand feeding the other what has been going on the last couple of months?     I also noticed that $240,000 private sale from an insider at 60 cents back in December consisting of 400,000 shares that another posted had mentioned.
 
Regarding Lone Pine, I tried to get information from the new company about Lone Pine by both email and phone but could not get a return call or email under the new management last year.
 
Why not tag it as a property on their website that they intend to make payments on at least, where they may possibly pursue it in the future given the funding or market conditions?    After taking over Bard, the first question on any current investor’s mind would naturally be about the future of Lone Pine, one would think?  But the new management doesn't even mention it.    Why would that be?     

If Lone Pine is not going to be pursued but just acquire new projects instead, then why not just start up a brand new exploration company instead of taking over Bard?   And if it may be pursued later then why the omission?

 
 


<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>