RE:Bad dealOur ceo was also involved with Midway - the previous owner of the project along with Fiore's Pan. What happened to Midway? How well did shareholders fair with the bankrupcy? I can only question, as one listener to today's call asked, why GPY up in the Yukon when there are many other superior companies, projects and teams that can add shareholder value? Couldn't there be substantial savings/synergies with Fiore's Pan? Our project could greatly benefit in a number of ways. There are many similar opportunities within Nevada. The benefits of this combination can be nowhere near the savings to be found within nearby operations. There has been a pre-existing consulting agreement between our ceo and GPY. I really question whether this proposal is best for shareholders and question whether appropriate due diligence has been conducted, whether shareholder interests have been priority and whether the nearby, more profting oportunities have overlooked, ignored, or discarded because of the favourable outcome given our ceo? As shareholders we need to seriously question whether this is anywhere near an optimal outcome. Why GPY? Why now? Where are our drill results? and why not a company with at least a potential to create the most synergistic, bottom-line optimal, shareholder benefiting outcome possible? I am not impressed and yes deepthinker63, I too will vote no.